Marcus Rashford’s Future Shapes Manchester United’s Summer Transfer Plans

Tottenham have agreed a €117m package for Sandro Tonali, while United reassess midfield targets and wait on Rashford before pursuing a winger.

Jul 01, 2026 ● 3 min read
Sign in to save

Two decisions shaping United’s summer

Manchester United’s summer plans now hinge on two unresolved questions: who can strengthen midfield at a price the club accepts, and whether Marcus Rashford stays. Tottenham’s agreement for Sandro Tonali has narrowed the midfield picture, while Rashford’s openness to returning could pause United’s search for a left winger. The two issues are linked by a broader constraint: each possible signing depends on how United judge the cost, the options already available and the squad space they have to work with.

That leaves United balancing urgency against patience. Losing a target can push a club towards another name, but the prices attached to the remaining midfielders suggest there’s little room for an automatic replacement. At the same time, Rashford’s future affects whether a winger is needed at all. Here’s the thing: this summer’s decisions may be less about building a long shopping list than choosing which needs are worth paying to address.

Tottenham move ahead for Tonali

Tottenham have agreed a €117 million package with Newcastle for Sandro Tonali, according to David Ornstein, and have settled personal terms with the Italy international. Spurs had already beaten United to Mateus Fernandes, whose move is set to cost €98 million. Taken together, the deals put two high-profile midfield options out of United’s reach and show how quickly the market can narrow when several clubs pursue players in the same area of the pitch.

United were interested in Tonali, but judged the financial terms too high. That decision fits the club’s stated approach to the midfield rebuild: add quality without letting the cost dictate the plan. The distinction matters. A major fee can address an immediate need, but it also shapes what a club can spend elsewhere and how much pressure falls on the new arrival to justify the investment.

United’s restraint may prove sensible if the price is beyond what the club considers reasonable, though it carries a cost of its own: fewer established choices to pursue as the window develops. Tonali’s expected move also makes it harder to treat the midfield shortlist as fixed. One departure from the market can change the terms around other targets, even if it doesn’t make those players better value.

Sandro Tonali
© IMAGO - Sandro Tonali

Midfield targets remain expensive

Missing out on Fernandes has prompted United to revisit their shortlist. Aurélien Tchouaméni remains a preferred option, but Fabrizio Romano reports that a deal for the Real Madrid midfielder is currently considered unlikely. That leaves United with an interest in a player they admire and a clear limit on what looks achievable; interest alone doesn’t make a deal likely.

Alex Scott is also high on United’s list. Bournemouth are reluctant to sell the England midfielder, and a transfer would cost more than €80 million. That price, alongside the resistance to selling, makes Scott a difficult route even if United see him as a strong fit. The club has to weigh the quality of the target against the cost of persuading another team to part with him.

With Ederson already brought in, United may wait until later in the window to add another midfielder. That would give the club more time to assess its options, but waiting can also leave fewer alternatives available. If you’re working in this space, the challenge is familiar: a squad need can be real while the market offers no deal that makes sense at the asking price.

The numbers here are underwhelming as a guide to what United can do next. Tonali’s package and the reported cost of Scott show that available options come with steep demands, while Tchouaméni is considered unlikely. United may have to accept a different profile, delay the decision or pay more than planned. None of those outcomes is guaranteed.

Rashford could return to Carrington

Rashford’s Barcelona loan ended on 30 June, making him a United player again. He is at the World Cup and is expected to return to Carrington after the tournament, but a summer departure is no longer a foregone conclusion. That shift gives United a reason to leave room for his return while his immediate plans remain unsettled.

Romano says the winger has sent positive signals about staying and is open to joining Michael Carrick’s preseason. “We can't guarantee that Rashford is 100% staying at United,” he said, pointing to the eight weeks remaining in the transfer window. Still, Rashford’s willingness to consider a fresh start at the club gives United a reason to wait before committing to a sale.

A return would put the focus on whether the player and club can make a new spell work, rather than on the loan that has just ended. Positive signals aren’t a firm commitment, and the remaining time in the window leaves room for the situation to change. The uncertainty is useful to neither side if it drags on, but a premature decision could close off an option United now appear willing to consider.

Marcus Rashford
© IMAGO - Marcus Rashford

Left-wing plans depend on Rashford

United’s interest in West Ham’s Crysencio Summerville is tied directly to Rashford’s situation. Sky Sports reports that Summerville has emerged as a leading target, but United are expected to pursue a winger only if Rashford leaves. That conditional approach makes the forward’s future a practical question for recruitment, not merely a separate squad decision.

United are also unlikely to sell Manuel Ugarte after his injury, limiting the room for another wide-player signing. The practical takeaway is that Rashford’s decision could shape more than the forward line: it may determine whether United act for Summerville at all. And this is the part most people overlook: keeping a player can affect which other positions the club feels able to address, especially when its spending decisions are already constrained.

For now, United’s plans remain contingent. Rashford’s openness could spare the club from pursuing a winger, while his departure would make Summerville a more direct target; neither outcome is settled. In midfield, the club has passed on one expensive option and faces uncertainty around others. A pause may be sensible, but it also leaves United dependent on how these unresolved situations develop.

What the decisions could mean

This is more significant than it looks. United’s approach to Rashford and midfield recruitment could determine not only who arrives, but which positions receive attention first. The club is weighing separate decisions that affect one another: the cost of a midfielder, the availability of a winger and the role Rashford might have if he returns.

That said, the picture is still incomplete. The reports describe interest, expectations and current assessments, rather than settled outcomes for United’s remaining targets. A later change in the market could alter the options, but there’s no basis here to assume which way it will turn. For now, the clearest signal is that United are trying to leave themselves room to choose, even as the list of straightforward options gets shorter.

Plenty still to resolve.

Source: Tom Weber · www.footballtransfers.com

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.